Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Bumpfire Stock Ban
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3040731" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>The flintlock was an assault weapon in it's day. You know that don't you? It was a military weapon that all have evolved from to this day.</p><p>When the rifled barrels came about vs the smooth bores, the Britt's called that war crimes because they were "too accurate".</p><p>You see where I'm coming from? </p><p>Where do you call it an assault weapon? Your description is exactly what the leftist and gun grabbers hope the American public sees so they can remove "scary looking guns" from the market. </p><p>The 10-22 has the same action.....a self loading action since the 80's </p><p>Remington 742 Deer Gun has a self loading action since the 70's.</p><p>All have the capability of 100 round magazines. </p><p>You can modify a 10-22 to look as "scary" as an AR just by changing the stock. I have one. Does it change the operation of the gun, or does it just make it look "scary". Is "scary" more dangerous than a 10-22 off the shelf?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3040731, member: 5412"] The flintlock was an assault weapon in it's day. You know that don't you? It was a military weapon that all have evolved from to this day. When the rifled barrels came about vs the smooth bores, the Britt's called that war crimes because they were "too accurate". You see where I'm coming from? Where do you call it an assault weapon? Your description is exactly what the leftist and gun grabbers hope the American public sees so they can remove "scary looking guns" from the market. The 10-22 has the same action.....a self loading action since the 80's Remington 742 Deer Gun has a self loading action since the 70's. All have the capability of 100 round magazines. You can modify a 10-22 to look as "scary" as an AR just by changing the stock. I have one. Does it change the operation of the gun, or does it just make it look "scary". Is "scary" more dangerous than a 10-22 off the shelf? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Bumpfire Stock Ban
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom