Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CA Bullet-Microstamping Law Upheld By 9th Circuit, Even Though Technology Doesn't Exist
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacFromOK" data-source="post: 3144631" data-attributes="member: 40864"><p>No, just semi-autos (for now). Revolvers don't throw brass everywhere at a crime scene though.</p><p></p><p>One of my favorite parts of the article:</p><p></p><p><em>When this certification occurred in 2013, the State clarified that the certification confirmed only “the lack of any patent restrictions on the imprinting technology, not the availability of the technology itself.” <strong>In layman’s terms, the state was saying that nothing was stopping someone from developing the technology, so it was “available,” even though it wasn’t.</strong></em></p><p></p><p>By that logic, Star Trek transporters are also "available."</p><p></p><p>Hopefully this will make it to SCOTUS and be overturned. And ridiculed. <img src="/images/smilies/new/drunk.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":drunk2:" title="Drunk 2 :drunk2:" data-shortname=":drunk2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacFromOK, post: 3144631, member: 40864"] No, just semi-autos (for now). Revolvers don't throw brass everywhere at a crime scene though. One of my favorite parts of the article: [i]When this certification occurred in 2013, the State clarified that the certification confirmed only “the lack of any patent restrictions on the imprinting technology, not the availability of the technology itself.” [b]In layman’s terms, the state was saying that nothing was stopping someone from developing the technology, so it was “available,” even though it wasn’t.[/b][/i] By that logic, Star Trek transporters are also "available." Hopefully this will make it to SCOTUS and be overturned. And ridiculed. :drunk2: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
CA Bullet-Microstamping Law Upheld By 9th Circuit, Even Though Technology Doesn't Exist
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom