Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Chris Murphy: Federal ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Would Have Prevented Vegas Attack
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Emoney" data-source="post: 3043457" data-attributes="member: 42949"><p>Yeah, I hate to say it but no why in hell would limiting the manufacturing, or importation of "assault weapons" Prevented that shooting. It didn't work before 2002 or 2004 whenever it was taken out. Why would re-enacting a proven failed policy help us at all. Man Politicians are just throwing sh** at the board and trying to see what sticks. The man could have done more damage without an "assault weapon". Just like politicians pleading to ban bump stocks. No one really even uses them unless your just having fun with friends or family. there inaccurate and a waste of good ammo and range time. However, its uneducated to ban the item its already been approved by the AFT I hope the AFT says it illegal now. So that the manufactures can file law suits again them. Vegas was just the act of a lunatic and I will fight every attempt to remove any of our rights because of one mans actions its mass punishment. Idk just ranting now but, man this subject get me going. Having said that I would trade bump stocks for the hearing protection act to pass if they would make that deal. <img src="/images/smilies/rant.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rant:" title="Rant :rant:" data-shortname=":rant:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Emoney, post: 3043457, member: 42949"] Yeah, I hate to say it but no why in hell would limiting the manufacturing, or importation of "assault weapons" Prevented that shooting. It didn't work before 2002 or 2004 whenever it was taken out. Why would re-enacting a proven failed policy help us at all. Man Politicians are just throwing sh** at the board and trying to see what sticks. The man could have done more damage without an "assault weapon". Just like politicians pleading to ban bump stocks. No one really even uses them unless your just having fun with friends or family. there inaccurate and a waste of good ammo and range time. However, its uneducated to ban the item its already been approved by the AFT I hope the AFT says it illegal now. So that the manufactures can file law suits again them. Vegas was just the act of a lunatic and I will fight every attempt to remove any of our rights because of one mans actions its mass punishment. Idk just ranting now but, man this subject get me going. Having said that I would trade bump stocks for the hearing protection act to pass if they would make that deal. :rant: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Chris Murphy: Federal ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Would Have Prevented Vegas Attack
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom