Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn getting ready to sell us out..!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2082253" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I have some questions for you. Do you even know what a UBC is? Has anyone proposing UBC's actually defined what it is? Is it mandatory checks at gun shows? For all private transfers? Any exemptions listed for immediate family or any other category?</p><p></p><p>No one knows what it will entail until we see the wording of the legislation. Which leads to my second question. Do you (or anyone else on this board for that matter) truly believe that that Congress can effectively embed the necessary constitutional protections to ensure that this can never lead to registration or confiscation? That it will never deny a law abiding citizen the right to possess a firearm? That it will never subject a person wishing to exercise their rights to onerous fees or taxes in order to exercise their rights? That it will offer a rapid and effective method to challenge a cause for denial?</p><p></p><p>As for Coburn wanting to improve efforts to deny mentally unstable persons from acquiring guns, there is only one measure that I would ever approve of. They need to make it mandatory for all courts to transmit information to NICS on those persons who've been adjudicated mentally incompetent in a court of law. It also needs to mandate transmittal of any court decision overturning an order of mental incompetence. It also needs to implement funding at the federal level for local and state courts to comply with this requirement.</p><p></p><p>I will never support the use of any health records in restricting the right of The People to keep and bear arms that hasn't been adjudicated in a court of law. Medical professionals are not trained in the proper application of constitutional law. They are not bound by the same Oath of Office, nor the rules of law in reporting mental health diagnoses. They are not required to allow or offer an independent verification before making a diagnosis that could ultimately restrict someone's constitutional rights. </p><p></p><p>I will outright say that I do not believe they can do these things in Congress. As a result, I cannot support any type of UBC legislation. To assume the current government we have would properly weight our constitutional rights against their own selfish interests is folly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2082253, member: 1132"] I have some questions for you. Do you even know what a UBC is? Has anyone proposing UBC's actually defined what it is? Is it mandatory checks at gun shows? For all private transfers? Any exemptions listed for immediate family or any other category? No one knows what it will entail until we see the wording of the legislation. Which leads to my second question. Do you (or anyone else on this board for that matter) truly believe that that Congress can effectively embed the necessary constitutional protections to ensure that this can never lead to registration or confiscation? That it will never deny a law abiding citizen the right to possess a firearm? That it will never subject a person wishing to exercise their rights to onerous fees or taxes in order to exercise their rights? That it will offer a rapid and effective method to challenge a cause for denial? As for Coburn wanting to improve efforts to deny mentally unstable persons from acquiring guns, there is only one measure that I would ever approve of. They need to make it mandatory for all courts to transmit information to NICS on those persons who've been adjudicated mentally incompetent in a court of law. It also needs to mandate transmittal of any court decision overturning an order of mental incompetence. It also needs to implement funding at the federal level for local and state courts to comply with this requirement. I will never support the use of any health records in restricting the right of The People to keep and bear arms that hasn't been adjudicated in a court of law. Medical professionals are not trained in the proper application of constitutional law. They are not bound by the same Oath of Office, nor the rules of law in reporting mental health diagnoses. They are not required to allow or offer an independent verification before making a diagnosis that could ultimately restrict someone's constitutional rights. I will outright say that I do not believe they can do these things in Congress. As a result, I cannot support any type of UBC legislation. To assume the current government we have would properly weight our constitutional rights against their own selfish interests is folly. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Coburn getting ready to sell us out..!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom