Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Cuba - let 'em back in or no?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2747418" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>Thank you. I only use my powers for good. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are welcome! If figured that if you were to give your home away due to your “white guilt” you might as well give it a faux Indian (feather &#8230; not dot) like Warren. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, you are spot on. I realize that not all Native Americans were nomadic just like not all liberals inbreed with their first cousins. Where you were “foolish” is saying something as inane as the UN taking land. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Correct. Possibly due to colloquialism and/or apologetic sycophants. This has been a typical response over the last few years to those being warned or called for being called bigots. All the same, it is possibly more polite than to call someone a “Jew hating bigot” or be scolded for breaking “Godwin’s Law”. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah shucks &#8230; your sarcasm is actually starting to flatter me. I would say that my “understanding” of the region comes from not reading liberal revisionist coloring books written &#8230; no, check that &#8230; “drawn” by Jew hatting bigots who like to apologize for Muslim aggression. Typically same historically challenged lads that want to blame the “Crusades” on Christian aggression. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You nailed it. “Mistakenly”. Now had I not shared with you the history you would have “mistakenly” believed that the area was named that because of the people and you would have also (mistakenly, mind you) believed that because of that all the Jews from London to Brooklyn moved there. And yes, for the last thousand or so years there have been a lot of Jews and Arabs owing homes and living in that zip code. Well, except for Yasser Arafat. PLO chairman Arafat was a Tunisian who lived in Paris because the French view man on boy love differently than Muslims. With that said, Arafat should have lived in the Vatican. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You left out the Haitian tranny’s occupation &#8230; “whore”. While no first hand experience with any whore, my understanding (and I could be wrong &#8230; Maybe SNIPES can chime in again?) is that If you had sex with a tranny whore from Haiti, I doubt you could do the liberal dance to revise history enough to fix what you just caught. The analogy is that having sex with a Haitian tranny whore is not a good idea. Then again, your mileage may well differ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2747418, member: 11175"] Thank you. I only use my powers for good. You are welcome! If figured that if you were to give your home away due to your “white guilt” you might as well give it a faux Indian (feather … not dot) like Warren. Actually, you are spot on. I realize that not all Native Americans were nomadic just like not all liberals inbreed with their first cousins. Where you were “foolish” is saying something as inane as the UN taking land. Correct. Possibly due to colloquialism and/or apologetic sycophants. This has been a typical response over the last few years to those being warned or called for being called bigots. All the same, it is possibly more polite than to call someone a “Jew hating bigot” or be scolded for breaking “Godwin’s Law”. Ah shucks … your sarcasm is actually starting to flatter me. I would say that my “understanding” of the region comes from not reading liberal revisionist coloring books written … no, check that … “drawn” by Jew hatting bigots who like to apologize for Muslim aggression. Typically same historically challenged lads that want to blame the “Crusades” on Christian aggression. You nailed it. “Mistakenly”. Now had I not shared with you the history you would have “mistakenly” believed that the area was named that because of the people and you would have also (mistakenly, mind you) believed that because of that all the Jews from London to Brooklyn moved there. And yes, for the last thousand or so years there have been a lot of Jews and Arabs owing homes and living in that zip code. Well, except for Yasser Arafat. PLO chairman Arafat was a Tunisian who lived in Paris because the French view man on boy love differently than Muslims. With that said, Arafat should have lived in the Vatican. You left out the Haitian tranny’s occupation … “whore”. While no first hand experience with any whore, my understanding (and I could be wrong … Maybe SNIPES can chime in again?) is that If you had sex with a tranny whore from Haiti, I doubt you could do the liberal dance to revise history enough to fix what you just caught. The analogy is that having sex with a Haitian tranny whore is not a good idea. Then again, your mileage may well differ. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Cuba - let 'em back in or no?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom