cz vs browning hi power

[langston302]

After owning both and shooting thousands of rounds through each.....I will have to say with a huge smile on my face the BHP hands down.

Both pistols have trigger issues. The HP was gritty and rough though manageable. The 75 was LONG and very stiff. I had trouble with it having medium sized hands.

The 75 was a bit harder to conceal for me. The HP just vanished in the IWB I had for it.

Its not very scientific but then there is the main reason. I got a huge smile on my face and loved every second of the time with the HP when we went to the range. It felt warm and like it had a soul. I never felt that with the 75 it was just a pistol.
Odd answer I know....but hey I dont care.

 

[Okvet03]

I have had a BHP for a while, just bought a SP01 on the forum. Just can't shoot it as well, so it will be for sale shortly. BHP all the way, I prefer the cleaner break on the trigger.

 

[ronny]

Cz p-01.

 

[LightningCrash]

The CZ is nice but the decocker and no thumb safety is a deal breaker for me.
On my 2nd BHP (first one was stolen) and I love it.

Sounds like you had a CZ75 BD.
All of the CZs I shot were single action. Trigger varied quite a bit.

 

[aeropb]

I gotta say there are a few different CZ model's I'd rather carry than a Hipower, but Hipower is the more popular choice.

 

[druryj]

CZ for me. Have owned and shot both, BHP is a fine, fine pistol, but the CZ just fits me better.

 

[farmerbyron]

BHP is on my bucket list.

 

[ldp4570]

BHP MKIII, there is no finer pistol!

 

[CHenry]

BHP is on my bucket list.

I'll let you shoot mine sometime if you want.

 

[farmerbyron]

I'll let you shoot mine sometime if you want.

If I ever get through planting wheat, I may have to take you up on that. Give me something else to make the wife angry about purchasing.