Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Does the Second Amendment cover edged weapons?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2997763" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Probation and parole are not bad things nor are they unconstitutional. However, if you do pardon or parole a violent offender, you take the risk of a repeat of the violent offenders actions. Restricting someone's right to keep and bear arms upon a pardon or parole is unconstitutional. That alone would be all the incentive a government needs to be certain of their decision to pardon or parole a violent offender.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is a constitutional issue in black and white because the Constitution does protect a person's Right to Keep and Bear Arms. If we are to be pragmatic about this issue, we must consider the consequences of relying upon unconstitutional law to keep arms out of the hands of violent felons. The law does not work. Keeping violent offenders locked up does. Keeping violent offenders locked up negates the need for any law requiring background checks for anyone wishing to purchase arms. That is two big plusses for society.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2997763, member: 745"] Probation and parole are not bad things nor are they unconstitutional. However, if you do pardon or parole a violent offender, you take the risk of a repeat of the violent offenders actions. Restricting someone's right to keep and bear arms upon a pardon or parole is unconstitutional. That alone would be all the incentive a government needs to be certain of their decision to pardon or parole a violent offender. It is a constitutional issue in black and white because the Constitution does protect a person's Right to Keep and Bear Arms. If we are to be pragmatic about this issue, we must consider the consequences of relying upon unconstitutional law to keep arms out of the hands of violent felons. The law does not work. Keeping violent offenders locked up does. Keeping violent offenders locked up negates the need for any law requiring background checks for anyone wishing to purchase arms. That is two big plusses for society. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Does the Second Amendment cover edged weapons?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom