Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Donald Trump: I’ll Sign National Reciprocity if It Reaches My Desk
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3441986" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>I know my position on national reciprosity will alienate and pizz of a lot of people here, but I oppose any form of "national permission" to carry anything that is a natural right, already recognized as an inailenable right in the Constitution; the constitution in which We the People delinetated limited powers to government and set prohibitions against wherein the government may get involved. If such a law is passed, it will be defacto recognition by the federal government that the several states may infact infringe upon the most important right that set us free and allows us to maintain that freedom against all enemies of the people, foreign and domestic. Lift the lid on this toilet bowl of infringement, examine the contents, and flush it all down the draiin to the sewer of bad law - law that would legitimize further infringement. There is only one solution to this dilemma: Remove any and all infringements on the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms.</p><p></p><p>If there are people out therre who cannot be trusted with arms, if not executed, lock them up until it can be proven they are no longer a risk to society.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p><p></p><p><span style="color: brown"> <em> If the ends sought cannot be achieved through the means granted to the Federal Government in the Constitution, there is neither a need nor the power for the Federal Government to get involved. </em> </span> B.E.Wood</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3441986, member: 745"] I know my position on national reciprosity will alienate and pizz of a lot of people here, but I oppose any form of "national permission" to carry anything that is a natural right, already recognized as an inailenable right in the Constitution; the constitution in which We the People delinetated limited powers to government and set prohibitions against wherein the government may get involved. If such a law is passed, it will be defacto recognition by the federal government that the several states may infact infringe upon the most important right that set us free and allows us to maintain that freedom against all enemies of the people, foreign and domestic. Lift the lid on this toilet bowl of infringement, examine the contents, and flush it all down the draiin to the sewer of bad law - law that would legitimize further infringement. There is only one solution to this dilemma: Remove any and all infringements on the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms. If there are people out therre who cannot be trusted with arms, if not executed, lock them up until it can be proven they are no longer a risk to society. Woody [color=brown] [i] If the ends sought cannot be achieved through the means granted to the Federal Government in the Constitution, there is neither a need nor the power for the Federal Government to get involved. [/i] [/color] B.E.Wood [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Donald Trump: I’ll Sign National Reciprocity if It Reaches My Desk
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom