Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Dubious & Insincere NYT Apology For Fast & Furious
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 1585685" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>The NYT doesn't owe anyone an "apology" for what the ATF did - all this really was about was establishing that they are "sensible" anti-gun folks who themselves would never have supported such an effort. Then they blamed the NRA for causing the root problem by blocking serious gun laws. Then they proposed the same trash they alsways have - restrict guns in the US generally because in some particular cases guns can be used to cause trouble/break the law. Constitution be damned - no need to Amend simply ignore it or declare it really "now" means whatever we want it to mean. Thus "Congress shall make no law..." turns into "Congress should pass more laws banning..."</p><p></p><p>My two cents...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 1585685, member: 18914"] The NYT doesn't owe anyone an "apology" for what the ATF did - all this really was about was establishing that they are "sensible" anti-gun folks who themselves would never have supported such an effort. Then they blamed the NRA for causing the root problem by blocking serious gun laws. Then they proposed the same trash they alsways have - restrict guns in the US generally because in some particular cases guns can be used to cause trouble/break the law. Constitution be damned - no need to Amend simply ignore it or declare it really "now" means whatever we want it to mean. Thus "Congress shall make no law..." turns into "Congress should pass more laws banning..." My two cents... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Dubious & Insincere NYT Apology For Fast & Furious
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom