Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
dun no body steal my idea beeches!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert871" data-source="post: 1582452" data-attributes="member: 10963"><p>i am positive this one exists, but i am tired of spotting scopes while shooting for fun at the range. maybe i just need a different scope and tripod, but i think it would make things easier to just setup a wireless camera looking at my target, then retreat to any distance inside 1000 yards, and have a small case with a monitor and a cloak so you can see in the bright sun. i am also positive this would and does cost a small fortune.</p><p></p><p>yeah, recoil count would be more reliable probably. my only thought was recoil varies from gun to gun, and if someone had a 22 that they for some reason wanted it on, the thing might confuse being bumped for being shot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert871, post: 1582452, member: 10963"] i am positive this one exists, but i am tired of spotting scopes while shooting for fun at the range. maybe i just need a different scope and tripod, but i think it would make things easier to just setup a wireless camera looking at my target, then retreat to any distance inside 1000 yards, and have a small case with a monitor and a cloak so you can see in the bright sun. i am also positive this would and does cost a small fortune. yeah, recoil count would be more reliable probably. my only thought was recoil varies from gun to gun, and if someone had a 22 that they for some reason wanted it on, the thing might confuse being bumped for being shot. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
dun no body steal my idea beeches!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom