Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Empty store shelves
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seadog" data-source="post: 3735043" data-attributes="member: 9018"><p>Problem is the vast majority of people would not have saved or invested for retirement to reap those interest benefits. If you look at the average person’s retirement it’s even worse than what you get from SSI. I do not condone a nanny state but I understand the reasoning behind it when they did it way back when. They need to cut off all the druggies, alcoholics and deadbeats that are collecting off SSI. Too many mouths on the teat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seadog, post: 3735043, member: 9018"] Problem is the vast majority of people would not have saved or invested for retirement to reap those interest benefits. If you look at the average person’s retirement it’s even worse than what you get from SSI. I do not condone a nanny state but I understand the reasoning behind it when they did it way back when. They need to cut off all the druggies, alcoholics and deadbeats that are collecting off SSI. Too many mouths on the teat. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Empty store shelves
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom