Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Engrave??? or not to Engrave??
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CAR-AR-M16" data-source="post: 1117426" data-attributes="member: 204"><p>Thanks for the info RobC. I do see your point. As for me, I don't mind having "Me, Lawton, OK" stamped on mine anymore the "Remington, Ilion, NY". I don't currently live in either one of those places. Just doesn't bother me at all.</p><p> </p><p>As for your food for thought, consider this: If you sent your AK to Red Jacket (without a Form 1) and asked them to convert it to an SBR, then they would make it an SBR, register it with ATF on a form 2, engrave their info (as they are the maker) and then transfer it to you on a Form 4 as an existing SBR. If you file the form 1 as the maker and then send it to Red Jacket they would not need to do any engraving as you have already made it an SBR using the form 1. They are simply being subcontracted by you (the maker) to perform the work. Yes they are doing the exact same work, but since they did not register it with ATF (you did with your form 1) they would not need to engrave their info. I would consider the maker to be the one who registers the gun with ATF (either by Form 1 or Form 2) to be the maker, not the person who actually performs the work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CAR-AR-M16, post: 1117426, member: 204"] Thanks for the info RobC. I do see your point. As for me, I don't mind having "Me, Lawton, OK" stamped on mine anymore the "Remington, Ilion, NY". I don't currently live in either one of those places. Just doesn't bother me at all. As for your food for thought, consider this: If you sent your AK to Red Jacket (without a Form 1) and asked them to convert it to an SBR, then they would make it an SBR, register it with ATF on a form 2, engrave their info (as they are the maker) and then transfer it to you on a Form 4 as an existing SBR. If you file the form 1 as the maker and then send it to Red Jacket they would not need to do any engraving as you have already made it an SBR using the form 1. They are simply being subcontracted by you (the maker) to perform the work. Yes they are doing the exact same work, but since they did not register it with ATF (you did with your form 1) they would not need to engrave their info. I would consider the maker to be the one who registers the gun with ATF (either by Form 1 or Form 2) to be the maker, not the person who actually performs the work. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Engrave??? or not to Engrave??
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom