Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Fact Sheet from whitehouse.gov on tomorrow's actions..
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2831301" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>My current reading is that the EOs give ATF agents more of a mandate to go after private sellers, even if they sell one or two guns and have other factors (such as the original packaging of the firearm , according to the AG ). </p><p></p><p>Seems like the <strong>current goal</strong> is to <strong>harass private sellers</strong>. But why? When the data clearly shows that private sales are less then 10% of gun transfers and have negligible contributions to crime?</p><p>See: <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/337834/private-gun-sales-numbers-robert-verbruggen" target="_blank">http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/337834/private-gun-sales-numbers-robert-verbruggen</a></p><p></p><p>IMHO, This is likely the start to create actual legislation in the future (if the right people win the WH and Congress) to keep going after private sellers within states. </p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2831301, member: 3553"] My current reading is that the EOs give ATF agents more of a mandate to go after private sellers, even if they sell one or two guns and have other factors (such as the original packaging of the firearm , according to the AG ). Seems like the [B]current goal[/B] is to [B]harass private sellers[/B]. But why? When the data clearly shows that private sales are less then 10% of gun transfers and have negligible contributions to crime? See: [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/337834/private-gun-sales-numbers-robert-verbruggen[/url] IMHO, This is likely the start to create actual legislation in the future (if the right people win the WH and Congress) to keep going after private sellers within states. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Fact Sheet from whitehouse.gov on tomorrow's actions..
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom