Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal Firearms Registry and 4473's
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 719519" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>The Constitution doesn't need to prohibit anything to the Union. The Union only has those powers granted to it(See Note Below). The prohibition against Congress establishing a national religion in the First Amendment wasn't really necessary. In order for Congress to establish a national religion, that specific power would have to have been granted. For that matter, the Second Amendment is superfluous in regards to Congress. Congress has not been granted power to regulate the keeping and bearing of arms. All of Congress's actions interfering with the keeping and bearing of arms, and trade in arms, is usurpation of power through the bastardization of the Commerce Clause. However, that bastardization of the Commerce Clause technically brought the Second Amendment into play and the Second Amendment should prohibit even the bastardized Commerce Clause from being used to interfere with(infringe upon) the keeping and bearing of arms.</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Note: The prohibitions in Section 9 of Article I in the Constitution are limits upon powers granted to Congress in Section 8 and upon other powers granted elsewhere in the Constitution.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 719519, member: 745"] The Constitution doesn't need to prohibit anything to the Union. The Union only has those powers granted to it(See Note Below). The prohibition against Congress establishing a national religion in the First Amendment wasn't really necessary. In order for Congress to establish a national religion, that specific power would have to have been granted. For that matter, the Second Amendment is superfluous in regards to Congress. Congress has not been granted power to regulate the keeping and bearing of arms. All of Congress's actions interfering with the keeping and bearing of arms, and trade in arms, is usurpation of power through the bastardization of the Commerce Clause. However, that bastardization of the Commerce Clause technically brought the Second Amendment into play and the Second Amendment should prohibit even the bastardized Commerce Clause from being used to interfere with(infringe upon) the keeping and bearing of arms. [indent]Note: The prohibitions in Section 9 of Article I in the Constitution are limits upon powers granted to Congress in Section 8 and upon other powers granted elsewhere in the Constitution.[/indent] Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal Firearms Registry and 4473's
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom