Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Feral Dogs
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacFromOK" data-source="post: 3026805" data-attributes="member: 40864"><p><em>"A comparable Oklahoma statute did not, however, protect a man convicted of cruelty for shooting three hunting dogs as they chased a deer. He had left the dogs, wounded but still alive, on someone else's land. <strong>The law justified killing a dog that was chasing livestock, but not one chasing wildlife, the court ruled.</strong> The defendant 'knew that he had hit the dogs and he was willing to let them drag themselves off and suffer and die,' said the court. 'The trial court felt that this was cruelty to animals, and we can but agree.' (Laner v. State, 381 P.2d 905 (Okla. 1963).)"</em></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/dog-book/chapter13-3.html" target="_blank">http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/dog-book/chapter13-3.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacFromOK, post: 3026805, member: 40864"] [i]"A comparable Oklahoma statute did not, however, protect a man convicted of cruelty for shooting three hunting dogs as they chased a deer. He had left the dogs, wounded but still alive, on someone else's land. [b]The law justified killing a dog that was chasing livestock, but not one chasing wildlife, the court ruled.[/b] The defendant 'knew that he had hit the dogs and he was willing to let them drag themselves off and suffer and die,' said the court. 'The trial court felt that this was cruelty to animals, and we can but agree.' (Laner v. State, 381 P.2d 905 (Okla. 1963).)"[/i] [URL]http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/dog-book/chapter13-3.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Feral Dogs
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom