Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
General Ergonomics and Quality of Modern Handguns
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rod Snell" data-source="post: 1187204" data-attributes="member: 796"><p><strong>Ergonomics of Glock stopped me from ever buying one</strong>. Why?</p><p>Having shot and carried K-frame S&W revolvers for many years, and havig had to qualify on the 1911, I had a definite opinion about grip angles. So in the mid-80's when I first shot the Glock, <strong>the Luger grip angle was an immediate negative</strong> for me. If I concentrated on pushing down the front sight, I shot great groups; otherwise, I shot high. Still do with a Glock.</p><p></p><p>But I've found a gun that has the <strong>good features of the Glock and does not have the Luger grip angle: the S&W M&P. </strong></p><p>For the many people that can switch between different grip angles without issue: congratulations. For those of us who revert to our earlier training and practice under pressure, the M&P is a welcome replacement for a Glock.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rod Snell, post: 1187204, member: 796"] [B]Ergonomics of Glock stopped me from ever buying one[/B]. Why? Having shot and carried K-frame S&W revolvers for many years, and havig had to qualify on the 1911, I had a definite opinion about grip angles. So in the mid-80's when I first shot the Glock, [B]the Luger grip angle was an immediate negative[/B] for me. If I concentrated on pushing down the front sight, I shot great groups; otherwise, I shot high. Still do with a Glock. But I've found a gun that has the [B]good features of the Glock and does not have the Luger grip angle: the S&W M&P. [/B] For the many people that can switch between different grip angles without issue: congratulations. For those of us who revert to our earlier training and practice under pressure, the M&P is a welcome replacement for a Glock. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
General Ergonomics and Quality of Modern Handguns
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom