Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Global Warming again?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="p238shooter" data-source="post: 1976502" data-attributes="member: 24583"><p>Lets see here, freons were destroying the ozone layer. Amazing this happened at absolutely three years before DuPont,s would wide patent for Freon12 and Freon15 were set to expire. DuPont got a royalty for every pound of freon produced worldwide, but that was about to end. Solution, ban 12 and 15, and replace it with something better that will not destroy us all. Guess what chemical company came up with the only acceptable solutions for the problem with a new 40-50 year world wide patent. Yep, DuPont. Surprise.</p><p></p><p>Now, let's fine the people on the land who are making the ozone that would float to fill he hole. Government can make a profit on both ends of the fiasco while looking like good guys holding the middle and protecting both ends from doom.</p><p></p><p>In most cases, FOLLOW THE MONEY. The LA Bason was filled with smog in the 1800's before man destroyed the environment there. The smog was supposed to move when man moved in? FOLLOW THE MONEY.</p><p></p><p>Supposedly we have to change our light bulbs because we are dependent on foreign oil and the price of oil is too high? How much electricity is produced by oil? Virtually None. $.50 light bulbs do not produce a lot of sales tax. FOLLOW THE MONEY.</p><p></p><p>When did it become acceptable and proper to flat out lie to people and it is OK? If you call them on it, they become offended and start talking about something non-related that is supposed to be someone elses fault and then the conversation is over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="p238shooter, post: 1976502, member: 24583"] Lets see here, freons were destroying the ozone layer. Amazing this happened at absolutely three years before DuPont,s would wide patent for Freon12 and Freon15 were set to expire. DuPont got a royalty for every pound of freon produced worldwide, but that was about to end. Solution, ban 12 and 15, and replace it with something better that will not destroy us all. Guess what chemical company came up with the only acceptable solutions for the problem with a new 40-50 year world wide patent. Yep, DuPont. Surprise. Now, let's fine the people on the land who are making the ozone that would float to fill he hole. Government can make a profit on both ends of the fiasco while looking like good guys holding the middle and protecting both ends from doom. In most cases, FOLLOW THE MONEY. The LA Bason was filled with smog in the 1800's before man destroyed the environment there. The smog was supposed to move when man moved in? FOLLOW THE MONEY. Supposedly we have to change our light bulbs because we are dependent on foreign oil and the price of oil is too high? How much electricity is produced by oil? Virtually None. $.50 light bulbs do not produce a lot of sales tax. FOLLOW THE MONEY. When did it become acceptable and proper to flat out lie to people and it is OK? If you call them on it, they become offended and start talking about something non-related that is supposed to be someone elses fault and then the conversation is over. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Global Warming again?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom