Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
GOP 2012 Presidency
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RickN" data-source="post: 1220049" data-attributes="member: 8854"><p>If things worked the way they should and were meant to, you would be correct, but they do not. Most of the time neither the president or anyone else knows what all is in the spending bills and usually they can not veto it without harming many needed programs. This is why congress always tries to lump as much spending together as they possibly can, to avoid a veto and why almost every president has wanted a line item veto.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RickN, post: 1220049, member: 8854"] If things worked the way they should and were meant to, you would be correct, but they do not. Most of the time neither the president or anyone else knows what all is in the spending bills and usually they can not veto it without harming many needed programs. This is why congress always tries to lump as much spending together as they possibly can, to avoid a veto and why almost every president has wanted a line item veto. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
GOP 2012 Presidency
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom