Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Buyer = Votes?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 2029994" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>The "conservative" Heritage Foundation didn't see that as a problem in the mid 90's.</p><p></p><p>How is telling people they can't use the medication and recommended by their physician that works for them more freedom? How is telling people who they can and can't associate with for a life-long relationship more freedom? How is not allowing liquor sales on Sunday more freedom? How is forcing government forcing their way into the middle of the doctor/patient relationship more freedom?</p><p></p><p>The nanny state plays both ways. According to Conservatives, you can't freely engage in sexual acts that the government does not approve of. You can't enter into relationships that the government does not first approve. You can't take the advice of your doctor unless that advice has been first approved by the government.</p><p></p><p>It seems that some would rather choose between nanny state flavors rather than choosing between the nanny state and freedom. And the typical distinctions between those flavors are made on the basis of a single issue while remaining completely ignorant of the big picture.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 2029994, member: 5151"] The "conservative" Heritage Foundation didn't see that as a problem in the mid 90's. How is telling people they can't use the medication and recommended by their physician that works for them more freedom? How is telling people who they can and can't associate with for a life-long relationship more freedom? How is not allowing liquor sales on Sunday more freedom? How is forcing government forcing their way into the middle of the doctor/patient relationship more freedom? The nanny state plays both ways. According to Conservatives, you can't freely engage in sexual acts that the government does not approve of. You can't enter into relationships that the government does not first approve. You can't take the advice of your doctor unless that advice has been first approved by the government. It seems that some would rather choose between nanny state flavors rather than choosing between the nanny state and freedom. And the typical distinctions between those flavors are made on the basis of a single issue while remaining completely ignorant of the big picture. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Buyer = Votes?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom