Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Control dead?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZombieHunter" data-source="post: 3141304" data-attributes="member: 5791"><p>In this hypothetical scenario, the people that would be doing the shooting, would be shooting the people who need to be shot to reverse tyranny.</p><p></p><p>The epitome of the function, utility and purpose of the 2nd Amendment.</p><p></p><p>No one is banning weapons in America. </p><p></p><p>Not until they ban Sugar. Diabetes kills more than guns by 2.5x. </p><p></p><p>Maybe older generations were easily fooled, but MATH is easy. And logic is easier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZombieHunter, post: 3141304, member: 5791"] In this hypothetical scenario, the people that would be doing the shooting, would be shooting the people who need to be shot to reverse tyranny. The epitome of the function, utility and purpose of the 2nd Amendment. No one is banning weapons in America. Not until they ban Sugar. Diabetes kills more than guns by 2.5x. Maybe older generations were easily fooled, but MATH is easy. And logic is easier. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Control dead?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom