Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hillary Clinton Won’t Admit Right To Bear Arms Is Constitutional
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2882631" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Know what is reasonable? If you don't, here it is: "Shall Not Be Infringed" is reasonable. There are many reasons the Right to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed, and all are valid. I can't think of any reason that infringing on the right would be valid.</p><p></p><p>As for any level of government having a right to infringe upon the RKBA with ANY regulation, no such right exists. In fact, the United States Government, created by We the People, has not been given any right whatsoever, nor is any form of government capable of having a right. Governments only have specific POWERS granted by the people.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: brown"> <em> If the ends sought cannot be achieved through the means granted to the Federal Government in the Constitution, there is neither a need nor the power for the Federal Government to get involved. </em> </span> B.E.Wood</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2882631, member: 745"] Know what is reasonable? If you don't, here it is: "Shall Not Be Infringed" is reasonable. There are many reasons the Right to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed, and all are valid. I can't think of any reason that infringing on the right would be valid. As for any level of government having a right to infringe upon the RKBA with ANY regulation, no such right exists. In fact, the United States Government, created by We the People, has not been given any right whatsoever, nor is any form of government capable of having a right. Governments only have specific POWERS granted by the people. Woody [color=brown] [i] If the ends sought cannot be achieved through the means granted to the Federal Government in the Constitution, there is neither a need nor the power for the Federal Government to get involved. [/i] [/color] B.E.Wood [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hillary Clinton Won’t Admit Right To Bear Arms Is Constitutional
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom