Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
HK USC Carbine
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OK Corgi Rancher" data-source="post: 3706112" data-attributes="member: 45773"><p>I had one way back around 2001. I shot it quite a bit but sold it to my business partner. He kept it until he died a few years ago as far as I know. He rarely shot it. I don't know why he bought it from me.</p><p></p><p>I didn't care for it, to be honest. The gun worked perfectly, all the time. The mags, in addition to the limited capacity, were kind of a pain in the butt to load and would occasionally not feed the last round (or last two rounds, on rare occasions). The trigger just sucked and it was heavy...probably 10 lbs or more. And it had this weird mushy feeling after the sear released and the gun fired. Also hated the skeleton-type stock. I thought it looked and felt cheap and it was difficult to get my eye low enough to get a good sight picture. I don't know if HK has changed anything on the USC in those years...but I just didn't care for the early gun. And, of course, being HK, customer service sucked...worst in the industry at the time. For the longest time HK had a REALLY bad reputation as treating customers as if they didn't need their business. Extras for the gun were really pricey, too. I always thought it had a lot of recoil for a .45 carbine. Of course it wasn't like a rifle...just seemed like a lot relative to what it was. It was a quirky gun.</p><p></p><p>Just my experience and opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OK Corgi Rancher, post: 3706112, member: 45773"] I had one way back around 2001. I shot it quite a bit but sold it to my business partner. He kept it until he died a few years ago as far as I know. He rarely shot it. I don't know why he bought it from me. I didn't care for it, to be honest. The gun worked perfectly, all the time. The mags, in addition to the limited capacity, were kind of a pain in the butt to load and would occasionally not feed the last round (or last two rounds, on rare occasions). The trigger just sucked and it was heavy...probably 10 lbs or more. And it had this weird mushy feeling after the sear released and the gun fired. Also hated the skeleton-type stock. I thought it looked and felt cheap and it was difficult to get my eye low enough to get a good sight picture. I don't know if HK has changed anything on the USC in those years...but I just didn't care for the early gun. And, of course, being HK, customer service sucked...worst in the industry at the time. For the longest time HK had a REALLY bad reputation as treating customers as if they didn't need their business. Extras for the gun were really pricey, too. I always thought it had a lot of recoil for a .45 carbine. Of course it wasn't like a rifle...just seemed like a lot relative to what it was. It was a quirky gun. Just my experience and opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
HK USC Carbine
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom