Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 2154513" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>The pseudoephedrine and ephedrine laws have nothing to do with meth. If you follow the money, you'll see the lobbying expenses from manufacturers of phenylephrine increase state by state until the "anti-meth" laws passed, and then basically cut off. It's simply about making access to a working natural medication harder to boost sales of non-working medication. If Oklahoma was first (not positive if they were and don't feel like looking it up at the moment), it's because they were the most easily bought politicians on the market at the time.</p><p></p><p>Meth is one of very few pharmaceuticals where it's cheaper to make your own than to get a prescription (or find someone with a prescription) and buy. Remember, meth is <a href="http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm088582.pdf" target="_blank">FDA-approved</a> with unlimited dosage for "behavioral problems" in children and obesity in adults, and it's often prescribed for off-label uses such as a depression.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 2154513, member: 5151"] The pseudoephedrine and ephedrine laws have nothing to do with meth. If you follow the money, you'll see the lobbying expenses from manufacturers of phenylephrine increase state by state until the "anti-meth" laws passed, and then basically cut off. It's simply about making access to a working natural medication harder to boost sales of non-working medication. If Oklahoma was first (not positive if they were and don't feel like looking it up at the moment), it's because they were the most easily bought politicians on the market at the time. Meth is one of very few pharmaceuticals where it's cheaper to make your own than to get a prescription (or find someone with a prescription) and buy. Remember, meth is [URL="http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm088582.pdf"]FDA-approved[/URL] with unlimited dosage for "behavioral problems" in children and obesity in adults, and it's often prescribed for off-label uses such as a depression. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom