Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2157300" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Your logic is flawed soonersfan. No one (not even those you listed) argued for legalizing meth production or usage. All they did was point out that the delivery method was the same. "Let's do it for the children." "Who needs ___?" "It's a matter of public safety."</p><p></p><p>The nanny state do-gooders will always find a way to demonize guns, pseudoephederine, whatever in their ultimate quest for <s>safety</s> control. Meth usage is bad in the way that irresponsible firearms usage is bad. Restricting OTC allergy meds on that premise is no different than restricting availability of firearms to the law abiding. Regardless of what your narc presenter (or Michael Bloomberg) say, it will do nothing to stop someone with bad intent. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2157300, member: 1132"] Your logic is flawed soonersfan. No one (not even those you listed) argued for legalizing meth production or usage. All they did was point out that the delivery method was the same. "Let's do it for the children." "Who needs ___?" "It's a matter of public safety." The nanny state do-gooders will always find a way to demonize guns, pseudoephederine, whatever in their ultimate quest for [s]safety[/s] control. Meth usage is bad in the way that irresponsible firearms usage is bad. Restricting OTC allergy meds on that premise is no different than restricting availability of firearms to the law abiding. Regardless of what your narc presenter (or Michael Bloomberg) say, it will do nothing to stop someone with bad intent. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom