Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightningCrash" data-source="post: 2157424" data-attributes="member: 4278"><p>You don't need a drivers license to drive a car in Oklahoma.</p><p></p><p>The US Supreme Court recognized that a drivers license is more than a simple privilege.</p><p>see Bell v Burson 402 U.S. 535 (1971)</p><p></p><p>The argument for the regulation of PSE is that 99% of the use is lawful but somewhere under 1% is used to make meth. The dangers of the meth are significant enough that we place regulations on the whole citizenry to protect the innocent from the abuses of the 1%.</p><p>The argument for gun control is that 99% of gun use is lawful but somewhere under 1% are used illegally. The dangers of illegal gun use are significant enough that they want to place regulations on the whole citizenry to protect the innocent from the abuses of the 1%.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightningCrash, post: 2157424, member: 4278"] You don't need a drivers license to drive a car in Oklahoma. The US Supreme Court recognized that a drivers license is more than a simple privilege. see Bell v Burson 402 U.S. 535 (1971) The argument for the regulation of PSE is that 99% of the use is lawful but somewhere under 1% is used to make meth. The dangers of the meth are significant enough that we place regulations on the whole citizenry to protect the innocent from the abuses of the 1%. The argument for gun control is that 99% of gun use is lawful but somewhere under 1% are used illegally. The dangers of illegal gun use are significant enough that they want to place regulations on the whole citizenry to protect the innocent from the abuses of the 1%. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hydroponics, anyone? Interesting raid on home of "growers"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom