Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
I was hoping to go check cameras and fill feeders tomorrow. Instead, I'll be pulling them.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 3852960" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>I wouldn’t have a problem restricting land ownership to citizens, but I’m not sure where you draw that line. Citizens of OK? Texans need not apply? Citizens of USA only? Is that Constitutional? Any of it? Seems like a pretty slippery slope for a bunch of Constitution loving, 2nd Amendment supporting gun owners. </p><p></p><p>Do homes count? How about commercial developments? </p><p></p><p>I don’t like it anymore than anyone else, but I do not and will not blame the landowners for cashing in. Land is worth, just like everything else in this world, what someone else is willing to pay. Just like ammunition, guns, cars, whiskey etc, etc, etc., with the large exception of “they ain’t making any more dirt”. </p><p></p><p>If you don’t want non-citizens buying up property, then someone is going to have to pay more for it than the non-citizen is willing to pay. </p><p></p><p>At some point, when the legislature fixes the pot growing laws in this state, some of that foreigner owned land is going to be back on the market at way less than what those dirty rotten foreign scoundrels paid. The legislature is to blame for the lax pot laws that allowed this to happen. I’m just shocked OK lawmakers screwed the pooch on that. It’s so unlike them to do something like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 3852960, member: 10690"] I wouldn’t have a problem restricting land ownership to citizens, but I’m not sure where you draw that line. Citizens of OK? Texans need not apply? Citizens of USA only? Is that Constitutional? Any of it? Seems like a pretty slippery slope for a bunch of Constitution loving, 2nd Amendment supporting gun owners. Do homes count? How about commercial developments? I don’t like it anymore than anyone else, but I do not and will not blame the landowners for cashing in. Land is worth, just like everything else in this world, what someone else is willing to pay. Just like ammunition, guns, cars, whiskey etc, etc, etc., with the large exception of “they ain’t making any more dirt”. If you don’t want non-citizens buying up property, then someone is going to have to pay more for it than the non-citizen is willing to pay. At some point, when the legislature fixes the pot growing laws in this state, some of that foreigner owned land is going to be back on the market at way less than what those dirty rotten foreign scoundrels paid. The legislature is to blame for the lax pot laws that allowed this to happen. I’m just shocked OK lawmakers screwed the pooch on that. It’s so unlike them to do something like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
I was hoping to go check cameras and fill feeders tomorrow. Instead, I'll be pulling them.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom