Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Injunction Denied By Judge Re: Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HeyEng" data-source="post: 3286638" data-attributes="member: 44022"><p>The bar won't give a crap about this. If I were a betting man, I would say at *least* 25% of lawyers smoke pot. There is a HUGE substance abuse problem in the field of law, and it ain't pot.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I could be subject to federal prosecution. Odds of that happening are pretty slim. Will I carry a weapon and pot at the same time? Nope.</p><p></p><p>The changed Oklahoma law pretty much tells OSBI to get bent in regards to taking my SDA license. Besides, I never said that I smoked pot...I am just licensed to do so; I am not worried. <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>Edit: If the state tries to take my SDA card, I will sue them. And, barring any professional conflicts, if any member here in Oklahoma gets a pot card and OSBI tries to take their SDA card, then I will help you sue them, too....pro bono. Take that to the bank.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, I wasn't implying that you were biting anyone's head off...I was speaking specifically to the Georgia folks that got all up in arms about it. The abbreviation has the same connotation and folks know what you are talking about...same as "clip" and "magazine." We all have our English/grammar hang-ups...mine is how I see "City of Oklahoma City" used everywhere. It's a city...I get it, no need to say "City of *** City" as this sounds ridiculous to me. Or how people interchange the words "motor" and "engine" which are different things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HeyEng, post: 3286638, member: 44022"] The bar won't give a crap about this. If I were a betting man, I would say at *least* 25% of lawyers smoke pot. There is a HUGE substance abuse problem in the field of law, and it ain't pot. Yes, I could be subject to federal prosecution. Odds of that happening are pretty slim. Will I carry a weapon and pot at the same time? Nope. The changed Oklahoma law pretty much tells OSBI to get bent in regards to taking my SDA license. Besides, I never said that I smoked pot...I am just licensed to do so; I am not worried. :) [B]Edit: If the state tries to take my SDA card, I will sue them. And, barring any professional conflicts, if any member here in Oklahoma gets a pot card and OSBI tries to take their SDA card, then I will help you sue them, too....pro bono. Take that to the bank.[/B] Nope, I wasn't implying that you were biting anyone's head off...I was speaking specifically to the Georgia folks that got all up in arms about it. The abbreviation has the same connotation and folks know what you are talking about...same as "clip" and "magazine." We all have our English/grammar hang-ups...mine is how I see "City of Oklahoma City" used everywhere. It's a city...I get it, no need to say "City of *** City" as this sounds ridiculous to me. Or how people interchange the words "motor" and "engine" which are different things. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Injunction Denied By Judge Re: Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom