Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is this the new VA?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3017495" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>SMS</p><p></p><p>In the Veteran Healthcare Enrollment and Expenditure Projections for 2002-2012 you linked to, it does state that 70% of new enrollment would be in group 7 but that 70% block of new enrollees would only comprise 30% of the expenditures predicted. It is probably true today that those in Group 7(and now 8) only use up roughly the same percentage of expenditures.</p><p></p><p>A new rule that went into effect for 2003 stated that if a non-service connected health need veteran didn't enroll within a certain period(10 years?), he could not enroll, and any such person who hadn't enrolled regardless of his date of discharge prior the enactment of the new rule could not sign up after some date in 2003(I don't remember the specific month or day). The projections in that report are moot. The projections were made prior to the new rule.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3017495, member: 745"] SMS In the Veteran Healthcare Enrollment and Expenditure Projections for 2002-2012 you linked to, it does state that 70% of new enrollment would be in group 7 but that 70% block of new enrollees would only comprise 30% of the expenditures predicted. It is probably true today that those in Group 7(and now 8) only use up roughly the same percentage of expenditures. A new rule that went into effect for 2003 stated that if a non-service connected health need veteran didn't enroll within a certain period(10 years?), he could not enroll, and any such person who hadn't enrolled regardless of his date of discharge prior the enactment of the new rule could not sign up after some date in 2003(I don't remember the specific month or day). The projections in that report are moot. The projections were made prior to the new rule. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is this the new VA?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom