Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It seems lots of people are being turned off by the candidates for Republican
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="farmerbyron" data-source="post: 1715498" data-attributes="member: 4953"><p>The reason I say that the climate is different than 1994 is that we now have 40 or so states that have legal conceal carry laws and castle doctrine laws that were not present in 1994. There is a large contingent of pro gun democrats that would not support another AWB. <a href="http://http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/03/sixty-five-pro-gun-democrats-in-the-us-congress/" target="_blank">http://http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/03/sixty-five-pro-gun-democrats-in-the-us-congress/</a> </p><p></p><p>I understand the thought that O will simply circumvent the constitution and do things through the bureaucracy. However on an issue with widespread support like the 2A, he would draw enough attention that congress could go the route of impeachment if O does not play by the rules. I mean if the congress is too cowardly to check this unbridled power by the executive, the republic is lost and we simply elect a king every 4 years. </p><p></p><p>I agree the EPA has become the biggest hindrance to business but that has gone on under Bush and the only candidate that would seriously axe any bureaucracy is Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="farmerbyron, post: 1715498, member: 4953"] The reason I say that the climate is different than 1994 is that we now have 40 or so states that have legal conceal carry laws and castle doctrine laws that were not present in 1994. There is a large contingent of pro gun democrats that would not support another AWB. [URL="http://http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/03/sixty-five-pro-gun-democrats-in-the-us-congress/"]http://http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/03/sixty-five-pro-gun-democrats-in-the-us-congress/[/URL] I understand the thought that O will simply circumvent the constitution and do things through the bureaucracy. However on an issue with widespread support like the 2A, he would draw enough attention that congress could go the route of impeachment if O does not play by the rules. I mean if the congress is too cowardly to check this unbridled power by the executive, the republic is lost and we simply elect a king every 4 years. I agree the EPA has become the biggest hindrance to business but that has gone on under Bush and the only candidate that would seriously axe any bureaucracy is Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It seems lots of people are being turned off by the candidates for Republican
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom