It seems lots of people are being turned off by the candidates for Republican

[Dr. HK]

It seems lots of people are being turned off by the candidates for Republican and I have heard several people state they will vote for Obammy. However in Oklahoma I really do not think it matters but, could this be the sediment across the nation? What are your thoughts? Are any of you so fed up you will vote for another 4 years of obummer?

 

[kd5rjz]

I'll be the first to say it, yes. I will vote for Obama over Gingrich or Romney. Why bother replacing one sellout corporate whore with another. I mean with Obama we've gotten four more years of the Bush presidency and nothing worse, so why rock the boat unless someone who's not a douche wins the primary.

 

[O4L]

I can't stand Obama, but sometimes I wonder if four more years of BO wouldn't be any worse than possibly eight years of Romney.

That being said, I wouldn't ever vote for BO.

I hope in 2016 the GOP can elect a canidate that is not a RINO.

 

[tRidiot]

That was my thought to those who say even though Romney isn't much removed from Obama, they'll still vote for him because he's a Republican (sort of). Obama can ONLY do 4 more years of damage, Romney potentially has 8.

They all suck, and not one of them is getting my vote.

 

[sanjuro893]

I'm so fed up with politicians on any side of the aisle that I started illegal experiments to clone Barry Goldwater. Right now he's in a glass mason jar in my shed. Only 35 more years of training and he'll be ready to run. That being said, it'll be a cold day in hell before I vote for a dyed in the wool socialist like Obama. VOTE GOLDWATER IN 2047!!!!!!

 

[angsniper]

Removed. But I still can't stand him!

 

[cjjtulsa]

However in Oklahoma I really do not think it matters but, could this be the sediment across the nation?

Don't know about the "sediment", but maybe the "effluent".

They're all on the same team, anyway, as far as I'm concerned. But looking past that, my concern with Obama is he'll be a lame duck, so re-election will no longer be a threat. He can tackle any issue he wants, and if he has enough votes in Congress we'll get a steady diet of excrement. The fact that he may get a shot at a few more Justices on the Supreme Court doesn't thrill me, either. I know, they're supposed to just interpret the law and be non-partisan - but if that's the case, why is it so important as to which party controls the Executive Branch when the appointments come up?

I don't like any of the above, and I'm not sure it's going to make a difference, unless we need one party or the other to point the stink finger at when it all falls down around our ankles.

 

[O4L]

If we could get a Republican majority in the Senate to keep OB at bay, maybe 2016 would be a better time for a Republican President considering our options now.

 

[Dr. HK]

They're all on the same team, anyway, as far as I'm concerned. But looking past that, my concern with Obama is he'll be a lame duck, so re-election will no longer be a threat. He can tackle any issue he wants, and if he has enough votes in Congress we'll get a steady diet of excrement. The fact that he may get a shot at a few more Justices on the Supreme Court doesn't thrill me, either. I know, they're supposed to just interpret the law and be non-partisan - but if that's the case, why is it so important as to which party controls the Executive Branch when the appointments come up?

I don't like any of the above, and I'm not sure it's going to make a difference, unless we need one party or the other to point the stink finger at when it all falls down around our ankles.

I agree with this. I would think that BHO will want to re-establish the Clinton Assault weapon ban, along with other issues. As it is I heard that there is like a $4.00 tax on ever box of ammo we purchase besides .22

 

[MLRyan]

Personally, I'm pro Ron Paul, but I know he will never get the bid. All the Republican candidates will be the same as Obama. My vote doesn't even get counted half the time(absentee)...