Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It's high time for a video of a great cop
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1583589" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>For the sake of argument, I'm going to assume that the subject in question appeared to be over the age of 18. Now, do you automatically assume that anyone you come into contact with on a call is a fugitive from justice? If not, why would you assume that someone in possession of a handgun who's otherwise fully in compliance with applicable law is a felon? If open carry were passed in OK, do you feel it would be right to assume that everyone exercising that right might be a convicted felon and run them? The presence of a firearm doesn't in and of itself provide PC to run NCIC on a person. It may be semantics, but had the officer run the subject prior to determining that the gun was unloaded, I could agree. After all, the very first rule when dealing with firearms is to always assume they're loaded. That would have been against the law in this case. Once he otherwise established full compliance with the law as fact, he lost the option to demand ID for the purpose of checking for a felony record. </p><p></p><p>It's a fine line, but a line nonetheless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1583589, member: 1132"] For the sake of argument, I'm going to assume that the subject in question appeared to be over the age of 18. Now, do you automatically assume that anyone you come into contact with on a call is a fugitive from justice? If not, why would you assume that someone in possession of a handgun who's otherwise fully in compliance with applicable law is a felon? If open carry were passed in OK, do you feel it would be right to assume that everyone exercising that right might be a convicted felon and run them? The presence of a firearm doesn't in and of itself provide PC to run NCIC on a person. It may be semantics, but had the officer run the subject prior to determining that the gun was unloaded, I could agree. After all, the very first rule when dealing with firearms is to always assume they're loaded. That would have been against the law in this case. Once he otherwise established full compliance with the law as fact, he lost the option to demand ID for the purpose of checking for a felony record. It's a fine line, but a line nonetheless. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It's high time for a video of a great cop
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom