Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It's high time for a video of a great cop
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightningCrash" data-source="post: 1584496" data-attributes="member: 4278"><p>Sarcasm discounted -- See `Castle Rock v Gonzales`.</p><p></p><p>Mrs. Gonzales called the police and said her psycho husband (whom she was divorcing and had a restraining order against) had taken her kids. Gonzales called the police at approximately 7:30 pm, 8:30 pm, 10:10 pm, and 12:15 am on June 23, and visited the police station in person at 12:40 am on June 23, 1999. The husband called the police station and acknowledged that he had the kids in violation of the restraining order. The police did not assign any personnel to address the issue. Her husband killed all of her children and stuffed them into the trunk of his vehicle.</p><p>She sued. The court sided with the police department, saying the PD had no requirement to respond.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You agreed with someone who planned to "shake down" everyone he saw carrying a firearm on the assumption that they are a criminal because "it is unlawful to open carry a firearm in Oklahoma."</p><p>That was just summarization. You indicated that you preferred this approach to the officer in the video. If my interpretation is a mistake then I apologize for mis-characterizing your position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightningCrash, post: 1584496, member: 4278"] Sarcasm discounted -- See `Castle Rock v Gonzales`. Mrs. Gonzales called the police and said her psycho husband (whom she was divorcing and had a restraining order against) had taken her kids. Gonzales called the police at approximately 7:30 pm, 8:30 pm, 10:10 pm, and 12:15 am on June 23, and visited the police station in person at 12:40 am on June 23, 1999. The husband called the police station and acknowledged that he had the kids in violation of the restraining order. The police did not assign any personnel to address the issue. Her husband killed all of her children and stuffed them into the trunk of his vehicle. She sued. The court sided with the police department, saying the PD had no requirement to respond. You agreed with someone who planned to "shake down" everyone he saw carrying a firearm on the assumption that they are a criminal because "it is unlawful to open carry a firearm in Oklahoma." That was just summarization. You indicated that you preferred this approach to the officer in the video. If my interpretation is a mistake then I apologize for mis-characterizing your position. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
It's high time for a video of a great cop
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom