Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rimfire Weapons
Maybe another 22 pistol
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="guns are dumb" data-source="post: 1090984" data-attributes="member: 5564"><p>I have both a Buck Mark and a MKIII. I've not handled or dealt with a 22/45, but I like my MKIII better than the Browning, I prefer the added heft and in general feel it's a better built gun (although I do have a compensator and Trail-Lite barrel on the Browning, which has made things lighter still). However, my opinion of build quality may have absolutely no bearing on how good the gun really is, even after 50K rounds, but, I still like my Ruger better. Despite the compensator on the Browning, it still has significantly more felt recoil than my MKIII (Hunter), the Browning changed very little with the new barrel and compensator. Browning mags are also more expensive.</p><p></p><p>All that said, my wife prefers the Browning <em>because</em> of its lighter weight, but here again, it would probably be more comparable to a 22/45 than my big Hunter model. However, neither one of us were able to hit anything with any accuracy until I put a FastFire II on the Browning, we didn't like the factory sites at all - I don't know why, nobody else seems to have this problem. The MKIII wears an UltraDot MatchDot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="guns are dumb, post: 1090984, member: 5564"] I have both a Buck Mark and a MKIII. I've not handled or dealt with a 22/45, but I like my MKIII better than the Browning, I prefer the added heft and in general feel it's a better built gun (although I do have a compensator and Trail-Lite barrel on the Browning, which has made things lighter still). However, my opinion of build quality may have absolutely no bearing on how good the gun really is, even after 50K rounds, but, I still like my Ruger better. Despite the compensator on the Browning, it still has significantly more felt recoil than my MKIII (Hunter), the Browning changed very little with the new barrel and compensator. Browning mags are also more expensive. All that said, my wife prefers the Browning [I]because[/I] of its lighter weight, but here again, it would probably be more comparable to a 22/45 than my big Hunter model. However, neither one of us were able to hit anything with any accuracy until I put a FastFire II on the Browning, we didn't like the factory sites at all - I don't know why, nobody else seems to have this problem. The MKIII wears an UltraDot MatchDot. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rimfire Weapons
Maybe another 22 pistol
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom