Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Military court upholds Michael Behenna's conviction, sentence
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RugersGR8" data-source="post: 1582913" data-attributes="member: 56"><p>Evidently you do not believe in due process of the law or forensics. This evidence should not have been withheld by the prosecution. Railroading the outcome of a trial(military or civilian) is not justice:</p><p></p><p><em>..... <strong>"A forensic expert witness for the government</strong> was never called to testify, but told Behenna's attorney - near the trial's conclusion - that he would have made a good witness for them. Questioned by Behenna's attorneys, prosecutors said they didn't know what he was talking about."......</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>....."Vicki Behenna, who is a federal prosecutor in Oklahoma City, said she found the appeals court's reasoning “disturbing,” since the expert's testimony would have corroborated that of two defense experts and given her son's self-defense claim more credibility.".....</em></p><p></p><p>Sounds like a prosecutor that's trying to add a whole bunch of wins in court to bolster his ego/career. And there could also be some politics and/or foreign relatilons things go on and they wanted Behenna to go away?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RugersGR8, post: 1582913, member: 56"] Evidently you do not believe in due process of the law or forensics. This evidence should not have been withheld by the prosecution. Railroading the outcome of a trial(military or civilian) is not justice: [I]..... [B]"A forensic expert witness for the government[/B] was never called to testify, but told Behenna's attorney - near the trial's conclusion - that he would have made a good witness for them. Questioned by Behenna's attorneys, prosecutors said they didn't know what he was talking about."...... ....."Vicki Behenna, who is a federal prosecutor in Oklahoma City, said she found the appeals court's reasoning “disturbing,” since the expert's testimony would have corroborated that of two defense experts and given her son's self-defense claim more credibility.".....[/I] Sounds like a prosecutor that's trying to add a whole bunch of wins in court to bolster his ego/career. And there could also be some politics and/or foreign relatilons things go on and they wanted Behenna to go away? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Military court upholds Michael Behenna's conviction, sentence
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom