Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More Consequences of The "War On Drugs"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1543044" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>So you're saying that enforcing the law that makes it illegal to deliver a controlled substance isn't as important as confiscating the money derived from said deliveries? If that's the case, then what's the point of the law in the first place? Say one of those drug mule customers dies. Does the agency tasked with enforcing the drug law that focused all their efforts on the cash cow bear any responsibility?</p><p></p><p>I'm not a 100% libertarian on this subject, especially when you tally the cost to the community in collateral damage caused by illicit use of Schedule I controlled substances. But let's face it, in many ways the "war on drugs" has gone off the rails. When you have agencies going after the money while virtually ignoring the drugs themselves, you significantly diminish the rationale for the law in the first place. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1543044, member: 1132"] So you're saying that enforcing the law that makes it illegal to deliver a controlled substance isn't as important as confiscating the money derived from said deliveries? If that's the case, then what's the point of the law in the first place? Say one of those drug mule customers dies. Does the agency tasked with enforcing the drug law that focused all their efforts on the cash cow bear any responsibility? I'm not a 100% libertarian on this subject, especially when you tally the cost to the community in collateral damage caused by illicit use of Schedule I controlled substances. But let's face it, in many ways the "war on drugs" has gone off the rails. When you have agencies going after the money while virtually ignoring the drugs themselves, you significantly diminish the rationale for the law in the first place. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More Consequences of The "War On Drugs"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom