Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Most ignorant anti argument to date.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="farmerbyron" data-source="post: 2067874" data-attributes="member: 4953"><p>Have any of you guys ran into this gem of an argument in favor of magazine restrictions? "If you can't hit a bad guy with 7 or 8 rounds, you shouldn't own a gun in the first place." </p><p></p><p>I guess these people have never seen or thought of an instance where there is more than one attacker or a drug crazed perp that doesn't respond to multiple hits from a handgun. </p><p></p><p>The example that immediately pops in my head is that woman in GA that shot an intruder in the face 5 times with a .38 and the guy lived. Can you imagine if that guy had an accomplice? I promise you she would have liked to have as many rounds on hand as possible. As a matter of fact even without an accomplice, I'd bet after her revolver went click and that guy was still alive and kicking, she wished she had more capacity at that moment.</p><p></p><p>Just can't believe some people have enough brain power to breath when they come at you with an argument that weak. No ability to comprehend unforeseen circumstances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="farmerbyron, post: 2067874, member: 4953"] Have any of you guys ran into this gem of an argument in favor of magazine restrictions? "If you can't hit a bad guy with 7 or 8 rounds, you shouldn't own a gun in the first place." I guess these people have never seen or thought of an instance where there is more than one attacker or a drug crazed perp that doesn't respond to multiple hits from a handgun. The example that immediately pops in my head is that woman in GA that shot an intruder in the face 5 times with a .38 and the guy lived. Can you imagine if that guy had an accomplice? I promise you she would have liked to have as many rounds on hand as possible. As a matter of fact even without an accomplice, I'd bet after her revolver went click and that guy was still alive and kicking, she wished she had more capacity at that moment. Just can't believe some people have enough brain power to breath when they come at you with an argument that weak. No ability to comprehend unforeseen circumstances. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Most ignorant anti argument to date.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom