Nick Sandmann (Covington student) is suing WaPo for $250 million dollars

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Snattlerake

Conservitum Americum
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
20,695
Reaction score
32,282
Location
OKC
NOW COMES Nicholas Sandmann, by and through his parents and natural guardians, Ted Sandmann and Julie Sandmann, and by and through his counsel, states his Complaint against Defendant, WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post(“the Post”) as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. The Post is a major American daily newspaper published in Washington, D.C. which is credited with inventing the term "McCarthyism" in an editorial cartoon published in 1950.
Depicting buckets of tar, the cartoon made fun of then United States Senator Joseph McCarthy's "tarring" tactics of engaging in smear campaigns and character assassination against citizens whose political views made them targets of his accusations.

2. In a span of three (3) days in January of this year commencing on January 19, the Post engaged in a modern-day form of McCarthyism by competing with CNN and NBC, among others, to claim leadership of a mainstream and social media mob of bullies which attacked, vilified,and threatened Nicholas Sandmann(“Nicholas”), an innocent secondary school child.

3. The Post wrongfully targeted and bullied Nicholas because he was the white, Catholic student wearing a red “Make America Great Again” souvenir cap on a school field trip to the January 18 March for Life in Washington, D.C.when he was unexpectedly and suddenly confronted by Nathan Phillips (“Phillips”), a known Native American activist, who beat a drum and sang loudly within inches of his face (“the January 18 incident”).

4. Nicholas stood quietly and respectfully for several minutes after being targeted and bullied by Phillips and Nicholas’body language remained non-aggressive and passive throughout the incident. Nicholas is 16-years of age,is 5’9” in height and weighs 115 pounds.

6. The school field trip to the Nation’s capital was the first out-of-state trip Nicholas had ever taken without being with his family.

7. In targeting and bullying Nicholas by falsely accusing him of instigating the January 18 incident, the Post conveyed that Nicholas engaged in acts of racism by“swarming” Phillips,“blocking”his exit away from the students,and otherwise engaging in racist misconduct.

8. The Post ignored basic journalist standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented,biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump(“the President”)by impugning individuals perceived to be supporters of the President.

For further reading...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rnio82555v8eiqk/2019-02-19 Sandmann vs. Washington Post - Complaint.pdf?dl=010
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,874
Reaction score
62,677
Location
Ponca City Ok
I hope he wins and sues the rest of the media that lied and defamed him.
The media has a history of lying about major incidents. Monetary judgements of the highest order may make the editorial staff do more research and actual journalism?
I don’t have my hopes up that will happen though.
 

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,492
Reaction score
15,886
Location
Collinsville
I hope he wins and sues the rest of the media that lied and defamed him.
The media has a history of lying about major incidents. Monetary judgements of the highest order may make the editorial staff do more research and actual journalism?
I don’t have my hopes up that will happen though.

Meh, a quarter billion is chump change for Bozos in comparison to pushing his liberal agenda. :(
 

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,722
Reaction score
56,146
Location
NW OK
https://patriotpost.us/articles/61283-libel-covington-boys-and-a-scotus-review
Libel: Covington Boys and a SCOTUS Review
Sandmann files suit against WaPo for libel, while Justice Thomas suggests revisiting a libel ruling.
Thomas Gallatin · Feb. 20, 2019

..."Speaking of the courts and libel, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas made headlines Tuesday when he suggested that the Court should revisit the 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The landmark First Amendment case effectively made it significantly more difficult for public figures to win libel suits."...
 

John6185

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
9,407
Reaction score
9,771
Location
OKC
He may not get what he is asking for in damages but he sure will get their attention. Frankly, I support him and hope he receives much more in a court settlement, I'm tired of all the fake news and reporting these days. It's no wonder people don't read much, it's all trash.
 

Snattlerake

Conservitum Americum
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
20,695
Reaction score
32,282
Location
OKC
Just heard today from the families attorney, he will be engaging in a war chest to fund going after "anonymous" threatening postings on facebook and tweets on twitter by subpoenaing for their accounts. He also said celebrities were not immune to their lawsuits either. One more thing, since the Sandmann boy is a minor, they have 2 years to file a lawsuit AFTER his emancipation to adulthood at age 18.

Fake news beware!
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom