Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
No Handgun! - Who is responsible?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jarhead983" data-source="post: 1235346" data-attributes="member: 7129"><p>I agree totally that an individual or company has a right to restrict who they want or to limit what you bring in, i.e. weapon. Now I don't have to go into those places if I disagree, but they should have the right. I just hope they don't express that right in the manner of limiting mine.</p><p></p><p>That being said, there has never been an occasion where a business was held liable for the actions of others. No injury or death caused by a robbery has cost a business a dime in liability to the injured/dead customer. Of course this is based on a belief system that every inidividual has a right to protect themselves. Unfortunately, that idea seems to be falling to the wayside. I think that at some point, given a well defined set of circumstances, that this will change. The gun buster sign will cause an individual who holds a CCL to be injured, and that person will be like those of us here who have an understanding of being denied our right to personal protection. He will then push the issue and get the right lawyer and right jury. You will then start seeing buster signs lining the trash cans. At least, I hope.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jarhead983, post: 1235346, member: 7129"] I agree totally that an individual or company has a right to restrict who they want or to limit what you bring in, i.e. weapon. Now I don't have to go into those places if I disagree, but they should have the right. I just hope they don't express that right in the manner of limiting mine. That being said, there has never been an occasion where a business was held liable for the actions of others. No injury or death caused by a robbery has cost a business a dime in liability to the injured/dead customer. Of course this is based on a belief system that every inidividual has a right to protect themselves. Unfortunately, that idea seems to be falling to the wayside. I think that at some point, given a well defined set of circumstances, that this will change. The gun buster sign will cause an individual who holds a CCL to be injured, and that person will be like those of us here who have an understanding of being denied our right to personal protection. He will then push the issue and get the right lawyer and right jury. You will then start seeing buster signs lining the trash cans. At least, I hope. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
No Handgun! - Who is responsible?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom