Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
No Handgun! - Who is responsible?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="finnimus" data-source="post: 1240538" data-attributes="member: 12900"><p>If an employer has reason to believe that an employee will engage in actions harmful to another and does not take "reasonable" measures to prevent the attack or protect its employees, then the employer is liable for the harm resulting from inaction. It all comes down to what a "reasonable" person/organization should do knowing there is a potential threat. The fact that an employer does not allow concealed carry doesn't automatically increase its liability or its requirement to provide additional protection. </p><p></p><p>I think the guy would have done the same thing even if he knew there were people who were carrying. He went in for revenge. Even if the employer allowed carry, it would most likely be a minority of employees who took advantage of the opportunity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="finnimus, post: 1240538, member: 12900"] If an employer has reason to believe that an employee will engage in actions harmful to another and does not take "reasonable" measures to prevent the attack or protect its employees, then the employer is liable for the harm resulting from inaction. It all comes down to what a "reasonable" person/organization should do knowing there is a potential threat. The fact that an employer does not allow concealed carry doesn't automatically increase its liability or its requirement to provide additional protection. I think the guy would have done the same thing even if he knew there were people who were carrying. He went in for revenge. Even if the employer allowed carry, it would most likely be a minority of employees who took advantage of the opportunity. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
No Handgun! - Who is responsible?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom