Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
"no need to give [...] Miranda warnings"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Brown" data-source="post: 1100704" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>The Miranda Warning is only given in custodial arrest situations where the government wishes to use information gained during or subsequent to the arrest or detention during the prosecution phase.</p><p></p><p>What the AG is saying is that Bin Laden has already incriminated himself thus there is no need to introduce evidence that could be obtained during custodial interrogation.</p><p></p><p>In other words, the prosecution won't bother introducing any evidence gained after his arrest and will only rely on his past self-incrimination.</p><p></p><p>Given that any information that the government would obtain after his arrest would be of a tactical nature rather than an evidentiary nature, I don't think it's a big deal.</p><p></p><p>It does not seem to be related to the fact that Bin Laden is a non-resident alien.</p><p></p><p>Michael Brown</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Brown, post: 1100704, member: 18"] The Miranda Warning is only given in custodial arrest situations where the government wishes to use information gained during or subsequent to the arrest or detention during the prosecution phase. What the AG is saying is that Bin Laden has already incriminated himself thus there is no need to introduce evidence that could be obtained during custodial interrogation. In other words, the prosecution won't bother introducing any evidence gained after his arrest and will only rely on his past self-incrimination. Given that any information that the government would obtain after his arrest would be of a tactical nature rather than an evidentiary nature, I don't think it's a big deal. It does not seem to be related to the fact that Bin Laden is a non-resident alien. Michael Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
"no need to give [...] Miranda warnings"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom