Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
OC Arrest
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1999718" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Apparently, you've never met a lawyer. <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>In actuality, voting is a function of the people facilitated by the government (election board). As for the paid vs. unpaid volunteer, it wouldn't matter if they were paid or not if there isn't a lease on the property. No lease, they have no standing to tell you to leave. (I'm not saying there wasn't, it's merely a question that should be answered). It also doesn't matter whether Tulsa Co. pays their precinct officials or not. This didn't happen in Tulsa Co. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Does 230:35-11-5. say anything about carrying a firearm within 300 feet of a polling place? Probably not, because it has nothing at all to do with the election or voting, whereas electioneering does. </p><p></p><p>Does O.S. 21 say anything about polling places in regards to lawful carry? If this is so cut and dried, then why doesn't it? I'm mindful that the provisions and exclusions within the SDA aren't all-inclusive, nor are they exclusive of every place one might go. Just like a great many laws, it cannot list every last scenario on a yes or no panel. Any half-witted fool should be able to figure out for themselves that there are certain boundaries that shouldn't be tested. I think openly carrying a firearm into a polling place should be one of those boundaries. I can't see a single upside to what this guy did. But that doesn't mean that all the questions surrounding this case have been asked and answered. In the end, they may never be fully addressed. The charges might be dropped, reduced, plead out, adjudicated guilty on a local level and not appealed all the way to the state supreme court, etc. </p><p></p><p>Laws are not nearly as black and white as many seem to believe. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1999718, member: 1132"] Apparently, you've never met a lawyer. :) In actuality, voting is a function of the people facilitated by the government (election board). As for the paid vs. unpaid volunteer, it wouldn't matter if they were paid or not if there isn't a lease on the property. No lease, they have no standing to tell you to leave. (I'm not saying there wasn't, it's merely a question that should be answered). It also doesn't matter whether Tulsa Co. pays their precinct officials or not. This didn't happen in Tulsa Co. Does 230:35-11-5. say anything about carrying a firearm within 300 feet of a polling place? Probably not, because it has nothing at all to do with the election or voting, whereas electioneering does. Does O.S. 21 say anything about polling places in regards to lawful carry? If this is so cut and dried, then why doesn't it? I'm mindful that the provisions and exclusions within the SDA aren't all-inclusive, nor are they exclusive of every place one might go. Just like a great many laws, it cannot list every last scenario on a yes or no panel. Any half-witted fool should be able to figure out for themselves that there are certain boundaries that shouldn't be tested. I think openly carrying a firearm into a polling place should be one of those boundaries. I can't see a single upside to what this guy did. But that doesn't mean that all the questions surrounding this case have been asked and answered. In the end, they may never be fully addressed. The charges might be dropped, reduced, plead out, adjudicated guilty on a local level and not appealed all the way to the state supreme court, etc. Laws are not nearly as black and white as many seem to believe. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
OC Arrest
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom