Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma coal mines
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 3901784" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>I've slept several times since I've worked eastern OK, but I seem to recall that the some tribes withheld coal and gas associated with coal from their patents when they allotted or sold land (they kept those particular minerals, whatever they were). </p><p></p><p>It varies between tribes and the McGirt decision may not even pertain at all. There's a lot more going on that what this article states, but I can definitely see the state trying to horn in on them. If there's a dime to be captured it seems the state will go after it whether or not they are entitled to it.</p><p></p><p>I'll also state that I've always been baffled as to just how McGirt only applies to criminal law and not civil. The tribes are a sovereign or they aren't. So which is it? <img src="/images/smilies/headscratch.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":scratch:" title="Headscratch :scratch:" data-shortname=":scratch:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 3901784, member: 3099"] I've slept several times since I've worked eastern OK, but I seem to recall that the some tribes withheld coal and gas associated with coal from their patents when they allotted or sold land (they kept those particular minerals, whatever they were). It varies between tribes and the McGirt decision may not even pertain at all. There's a lot more going on that what this article states, but I can definitely see the state trying to horn in on them. If there's a dime to be captured it seems the state will go after it whether or not they are entitled to it. I'll also state that I've always been baffled as to just how McGirt only applies to criminal law and not civil. The tribes are a sovereign or they aren't. So which is it? :scratch: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma coal mines
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom