Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Optics Choice
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="7stw" data-source="post: 3149637" data-attributes="member: 18402"><p>I have tried about everything. My choice is older Kahles. Swarovski x5 swaro z6 Zeiss conquest niggtforce nxs and Burris xtreme and like the op love the value of the fulfield line. </p><p></p><p>The kahles are the best I’ve found in clarity and light gathering. Even a 1” tube. Swarovski is a close second. I like the robust features and have the outdoorsmans in Phoenix build my turrets for them. Zeiss conquest z600 retical is similar to Burris wit the addition of the number 4 5 6 on the lower lines. If I’m going to dial which I do when going longer I prefer the Burris’s xtreme for edge to edge clarity and like the feel and audible clicks when adjusting. Older NF nxs are great as well. </p><p></p><p>Vortex just aren’t that sharp optically to me. That coupled with the fact your going to use their warranty.... eventually eliminate them for me. </p><p></p><p>Leupold just gives up to much for me in low light gathering. </p><p></p><p>The Burris fullfield are good I do notice some cram Aric adberation but for the price point durability and warranty I find myself using them. A kahles they aren’t but optically I’d challenge any vx1-3 against one. The vx4-6 edge them out in color but not much else. Thanks for the write up. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="7stw, post: 3149637, member: 18402"] I have tried about everything. My choice is older Kahles. Swarovski x5 swaro z6 Zeiss conquest niggtforce nxs and Burris xtreme and like the op love the value of the fulfield line. The kahles are the best I’ve found in clarity and light gathering. Even a 1” tube. Swarovski is a close second. I like the robust features and have the outdoorsmans in Phoenix build my turrets for them. Zeiss conquest z600 retical is similar to Burris wit the addition of the number 4 5 6 on the lower lines. If I’m going to dial which I do when going longer I prefer the Burris’s xtreme for edge to edge clarity and like the feel and audible clicks when adjusting. Older NF nxs are great as well. Vortex just aren’t that sharp optically to me. That coupled with the fact your going to use their warranty.... eventually eliminate them for me. Leupold just gives up to much for me in low light gathering. The Burris fullfield are good I do notice some cram Aric adberation but for the price point durability and warranty I find myself using them. A kahles they aren’t but optically I’d challenge any vx1-3 against one. The vx4-6 edge them out in color but not much else. Thanks for the write up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Optics Choice
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom