Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oregon: How is it possible for people writing laws to be this painfully stupid
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druryj" data-source="post: 3329482" data-attributes="member: 10465"><p>Yeah, but they won't. We are a long way from the Supremes just disregarding the lower courts and stepping in, and <em>on </em>their toes, to fix anything like this. I don't think they really want to either. It would be nice if we just had a National Carry Policy. (Well, we do and it's called the 2A but who really cares anyway?)</p><p></p><p>It's totally legal and accepted for me to drive a 5,000 lb vehicle at whatever posted speed through any state in the country with my OK DL. But when I travel with my legally owned handgun and my OK SDA License, I have to check with each state I might drive through or stop in to make sure I'm in compliance or risk going to jail?</p><p></p><p>Could the Supremes fix <u>this</u>? Or would it take Congressional action? I dunno. I guess the Supreme Court could say "The 2A guarantees the RTKABA, so all you pesky state governors, legislatures, and courts can just stop it with the stupid gun laws okay? And we mean it too!" Of course, then there would be a bazillion lawsuits filed, restrictive measures taken, and Anti-Gun Sanctuaries would abound all over the leftist leaning East and West coasts with Leftist LEOS bought and paid for by the likes of Bloombooger vowing to arrest any citizen who dares have a gun after being told they can't.</p><p></p><p>So there. Better give 'em up now pal, or risk being Harvey Weinstein's cellmate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druryj, post: 3329482, member: 10465"] Yeah, but they won't. We are a long way from the Supremes just disregarding the lower courts and stepping in, and [I]on [/I]their toes, to fix anything like this. I don't think they really want to either. It would be nice if we just had a National Carry Policy. (Well, we do and it's called the 2A but who really cares anyway?) It's totally legal and accepted for me to drive a 5,000 lb vehicle at whatever posted speed through any state in the country with my OK DL. But when I travel with my legally owned handgun and my OK SDA License, I have to check with each state I might drive through or stop in to make sure I'm in compliance or risk going to jail? Could the Supremes fix [U]this[/U]? Or would it take Congressional action? I dunno. I guess the Supreme Court could say "The 2A guarantees the RTKABA, so all you pesky state governors, legislatures, and courts can just stop it with the stupid gun laws okay? And we mean it too!" Of course, then there would be a bazillion lawsuits filed, restrictive measures taken, and Anti-Gun Sanctuaries would abound all over the leftist leaning East and West coasts with Leftist LEOS bought and paid for by the likes of Bloombooger vowing to arrest any citizen who dares have a gun after being told they can't. So there. Better give 'em up now pal, or risk being Harvey Weinstein's cellmate. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oregon: How is it possible for people writing laws to be this painfully stupid
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom