Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D. Hargrove" data-source="post: 3127019" data-attributes="member: 41761"><p>If forced to choose between Medical MJ and my SDA license the answer is simple to me, but if my medical conditions were to the point were the MJ would help, then I just do not know. I know there are those that are DEAD set against it, but I also know those that swear by the results particularly with severe arthritis and the such. With the evolution of legalization in other countries such as Canada, the results should be readily available within due time as to the positives and the negatives of legalization country wide. I will hold judgement until there are actual findings both medically and economically. I will vote yes as it simply is not that serious to me. Pot is pot, not meth, not coke, not Narco... If there are folks that may benefit from the prescription of MJ, then let them benefit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D. Hargrove, post: 3127019, member: 41761"] If forced to choose between Medical MJ and my SDA license the answer is simple to me, but if my medical conditions were to the point were the MJ would help, then I just do not know. I know there are those that are DEAD set against it, but I also know those that swear by the results particularly with severe arthritis and the such. With the evolution of legalization in other countries such as Canada, the results should be readily available within due time as to the positives and the negatives of legalization country wide. I will hold judgement until there are actual findings both medically and economically. I will vote yes as it simply is not that serious to me. Pot is pot, not meth, not coke, not Narco... If there are folks that may benefit from the prescription of MJ, then let them benefit. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom