Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3128301" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I just checked, and I don't see anything in the SDA precluding a carry permit for users of illegal drugs. However, it'd still be a federal crime, and there's nothing that says OSBI can't investigate such things and refer them to the feds for prosecution.</p><p></p><p>I've said it before and I'll say it again: even if this passes--even if it were made legal for recreational use--it's still illegal at the <em>federal</em> level, and Uncle Sam can prosecute accordingly. Dual sovereignty is a thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3128301, member: 13624"] I just checked, and I don't see anything in the SDA precluding a carry permit for users of illegal drugs. However, it'd still be a federal crime, and there's nothing that says OSBI can't investigate such things and refer them to the feds for prosecution. I've said it before and I'll say it again: even if this passes--even if it were made legal for recreational use--it's still illegal at the [I]federal[/I] level, and Uncle Sam can prosecute accordingly. Dual sovereignty is a thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom