Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3128358" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I don't have an answer. As far as SDA (or equivalent), I'd have to research each state's SDA law. Oklahoma's actually doesn't have anything about a <em>user</em> of drugs, just someone who has required <em>inpatient</em> treatment for substance abuse. I <em>do</em> know that Hawai'i has been comparing it's MJ rolls to its firearm owner rolls (see why registration is bad, kids?), and paying those firearms owners a visit to collect their guns. My understanding is that they're doing it based on the <em>federal</em> marijuana prohibition making those people prohibited persons, though I don't know if the "prohibited" persons is based in a state-law or federal-law level definition of "prohibited person" (i.e. they're users of illegal drugs because it's illegal at the federal level, but I don't know if HI has a state-level law against users of illegal drugs possessing firearms, or if HI is relying on the federal law prohibiting illegal drug users from possessing firearms). If that sounds convoluted as all hell, well, that's because it is.</p><p></p><p>As to other states, I really have no idea; Hawai'i is the only one that has really made the news, and I think that's because they were actually going out and confiscating. Going looking at all of the other states would be an exhaustively time-consuming endeavour.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3128358, member: 13624"] I don't have an answer. As far as SDA (or equivalent), I'd have to research each state's SDA law. Oklahoma's actually doesn't have anything about a [I]user[/I] of drugs, just someone who has required [I]inpatient[/I] treatment for substance abuse. I [I]do[/I] know that Hawai'i has been comparing it's MJ rolls to its firearm owner rolls (see why registration is bad, kids?), and paying those firearms owners a visit to collect their guns. My understanding is that they're doing it based on the [I]federal[/I] marijuana prohibition making those people prohibited persons, though I don't know if the "prohibited" persons is based in a state-law or federal-law level definition of "prohibited person" (i.e. they're users of illegal drugs because it's illegal at the federal level, but I don't know if HI has a state-level law against users of illegal drugs possessing firearms, or if HI is relying on the federal law prohibiting illegal drug users from possessing firearms). If that sounds convoluted as all hell, well, that's because it is. As to other states, I really have no idea; Hawai'i is the only one that has really made the news, and I think that's because they were actually going out and confiscating. Going looking at all of the other states would be an exhaustively time-consuming endeavour. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Physician opposition to SQ 788 speaks volumes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom