Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Popvox
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2046116" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>Excellent link! </p><p>here is my letter to it:</p><p></p><p>Dear XXXXXX,</p><p></p><p>I oppose Sen. Feinstein's New Version of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban because...most repeating weapons can be made to fire several rounds a minute using magazine changes or speedloaders. if Ms. Feinstein and other supporters of this Bill were intellectually honest they would propose banning all repeating firearms that can be loaded quickly.</p><p></p><p>But repeating firearms that can be reloaded quickly have been around for 150+ years. banning them would be unconstitutional.</p><p></p><p>So why ban any semiautomatics at all? Just becuae they look different?</p><p></p><p>A .223 round is an intermediate round, unsuitable even for killing a deer. Most semi auto deer rifles are WAY more powerful than an ar15. so what sis the point of this Bill?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2046116, member: 3553"] Excellent link! here is my letter to it: Dear XXXXXX, I oppose Sen. Feinstein's New Version of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban because...most repeating weapons can be made to fire several rounds a minute using magazine changes or speedloaders. if Ms. Feinstein and other supporters of this Bill were intellectually honest they would propose banning all repeating firearms that can be loaded quickly. But repeating firearms that can be reloaded quickly have been around for 150+ years. banning them would be unconstitutional. So why ban any semiautomatics at all? Just becuae they look different? A .223 round is an intermediate round, unsuitable even for killing a deer. Most semi auto deer rifles are WAY more powerful than an ar15. so what sis the point of this Bill? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Popvox
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom