Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Pro-Gun vs Anti-Gun
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 2025109" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>I've been reading anti-gun articles till 3 am last night, and just couldn't figure out - how can people be so far "off" from my thinking. And I think I almost got my finger on it - it's the perception of the weapon.</p><p></p><p>For anti-gun people guns are used only in criminal situation - mostly intended for <strong>assaulting</strong> people. And that's why "assault" weapon ban appeals to well to them.</p><p></p><p>For me - gun is the great equalizer when me and my family are being assaulted.</p><p></p><p>If a criminal decided to assault someone - it has little to do with the gun - they can use ANYTHING. </p><p></p><p>If three guys are breaking into my house - there is nothing like a gun that would protect me from absolutely certain harm to me and my family.</p><p></p><p>And that's where the difference lies - taking responsibility for your family, or just blaming for what happened to your family.</p><p></p><p>And that's what I don't understand - how can someone come into my house and tell me that all I need is a 10 round magazine ... why not 9? why not 12 or 27 or 6? Where is the logic?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 2025109, member: 3455"] I've been reading anti-gun articles till 3 am last night, and just couldn't figure out - how can people be so far "off" from my thinking. And I think I almost got my finger on it - it's the perception of the weapon. For anti-gun people guns are used only in criminal situation - mostly intended for [b]assaulting[/b] people. And that's why "assault" weapon ban appeals to well to them. For me - gun is the great equalizer when me and my family are being assaulted. If a criminal decided to assault someone - it has little to do with the gun - they can use ANYTHING. If three guys are breaking into my house - there is nothing like a gun that would protect me from absolutely certain harm to me and my family. And that's where the difference lies - taking responsibility for your family, or just blaming for what happened to your family. And that's what I don't understand - how can someone come into my house and tell me that all I need is a 10 round magazine ... why not 9? why not 12 or 27 or 6? Where is the logic? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Pro-Gun vs Anti-Gun
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom