Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Rep. James Lankford's Town Hall meeting 2A letdown.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2055446" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>Based on your first hand report, it seems like he does not believe 2A is to protect the security of the State against tyrannical powers inside or outside , but instead just to protect individuals rights to hunt, sport shoot and protect against individual crimes. Odd, since it says "security of a free state" in 2A!</p><p>Looks like Lankford MAY be FOR the mandatory background check then, which is a very bad idea and a path to registration of all firearms. </p><p>Need to hold his feet to the fire and call call call...all of you who are his constituents. </p><p>I called my congressman, Jim Bridenstine today...what a pleasure speaking to a staffer who was actually on the same page as all of us. She said JIm is very much against any kind of BG check and that "gun laws have worked very well. They have prevented legal owners from getting guns. The illegal ones get them anyway"</p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2055446, member: 3553"] Based on your first hand report, it seems like he does not believe 2A is to protect the security of the State against tyrannical powers inside or outside , but instead just to protect individuals rights to hunt, sport shoot and protect against individual crimes. Odd, since it says "security of a free state" in 2A! Looks like Lankford MAY be FOR the mandatory background check then, which is a very bad idea and a path to registration of all firearms. Need to hold his feet to the fire and call call call...all of you who are his constituents. I called my congressman, Jim Bridenstine today...what a pleasure speaking to a staffer who was actually on the same page as all of us. She said JIm is very much against any kind of BG check and that "gun laws have worked very well. They have prevented legal owners from getting guns. The illegal ones get them anyway" :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Rep. James Lankford's Town Hall meeting 2A letdown.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom